Shelter Insights
Free analytics computed from public shelter open data. See how we calculate them

How counting foster time changes shelter length of stay

Many shelter systems record "foster" as an outcome and a return from foster as a new intake. That stops the length-of-stay clock while the animal is still in the shelter's care, so stays look shorter than they are.

What we did

Three of the eight public shelters in our data code foster this way: Dallas, TX; Louisville, KY; and Norfolk, VA. We linked each foster exit to the same animal's return-from-foster intake and counted the stay through to the final outcome. That covers 258,463 completed stays.

What changed

As recorded → foster time linked
ShelterMedian daysAverage daysOver 30 days
Dallas, TX3 → 56.6 → 16.04.1% → 12.6%
Louisville, KY4 → 810.2 → 20.77.6% → 21.1%
Norfolk, VA4 → 912.9 → 23.210.4% → 23.0%

Why it matters

If foster time is left out, long-stay animals look like short stays, and the animals that most need a plan disappear from the numbers. Benchmarks that mix shelters which code foster with those that don't also compare unlike things. Our benchmarks and home page figures now count foster time wherever a shelter records it.

For your own data

If your software records foster placements, our member upload tools link foster stints to the same animal automatically. If it doesn't, the results note that foster time can't be counted. See methodology and foster program impact.

Source: Shelter Insights analysis of city open-data outcome records for Dallas, Louisville and Norfolk, processed Oct 22, 2026.